Desolation helps you choose thoughts, words and deeds that are opposed to your Divinely-shaped human nature. Desolation can also be the consequence of your own fallen human nature. When struggling with these issues, the Guidelines for Integrated Healing and Spiritual Growth will be of help. When you experience your manifest sins and addictions, practice: Declare, Describe, Descend, Denounce, and Decide.
See John , This is what we were created to do! When we do this, joy fills our hearts and completes us. Unfortunately, sometimes our flesh pulls us away from doing good and bearing fruit. But personal growth is not optional if Heaven and Hell are real—-which they are. The night before Jesus died, He prayed,. Do you remember what Jesus said to His parents when He was 12 years old? We will be far happier and fulfilled if we know why God has put us on this planet.
We must pursue the purposes of God for our lives. And you will be my witnesses, telling people about me everywhere —in Jerusalem, throughout Judea, in Samaria, and to the end of the earth. Jerusalem means, those closest to Jesus, and therefore those closest to us. This is our first responsibility.
We are called to make a difference in our world. Judea and Samaria mean, those close, but different from us. We are called beyond our world.
She argues that Barth offers diverse conceptualizations of the eternal being of Christ, depending on their doctrinal settings. Within the context of the doctrine of election Barth describes the eternal Christ as active subject. In a number of recent art- icles, Bruce L. McCormack explores the latter option. If God is eternal, as previously discussed, there is no temporal differentiation in God. But there still might be a logical and ontological differentiation in the divine being.
If a Jesus Christ is the subject of election, and b election is the logically first act of the divine will, then there is no Logos which is not incarnandus, to be incarnate. Hill and Frank A. The material concerning election in the last two articles is mainly a summary of the position developed in the first article. It should be said here that Barth himself deals with these concerns differently. For Barth, the incarnation does not constitute the divine being, but the divine being constitutes the incarnation.
Incarnation is possible because of the kind of being God is. God can enter into time, because God has time in Godself. The works of God ad intra the trinitarian processions find their ground in the first of the works of God ad extra viz. Is it an essential act or an accidental act? Since both are primal decisions taken in eternity, however, neither can meaningfully be described as a choice between alternatives. But, if an essential property can be described as a property for which there are no alternatives, a choice for which there are no alternatives is an essential property.
But here are the difficulties. First, if divine election is an essential act of the divine will, constitutive of the divine being, how can McCormack avoid the idea that creation is likewise essential to God and constitutive of the divine being?
It is the establishment of Jesus Christ, the God-man. If election is an essential act of God, so is the incarnation. But incarnation implies creation: it implies humanity.
Big Picture of Hell for Eternity
Therefore, if election is essential to God, then so is creation. Further, election and incarnation are constitutive of the divine being. But then, since creation is logically implied by election and incarnation, creation is constitutive of divine being.
Second, for Barth, as I noted before, it is the trinitarian nature of God, and the divine attributes established in and by that trinitarian nature, which makes election and incarnation possible.source url
Eternal Life -- What will it be Like? | Fountain of Life
How is that for McCormack? One would think that at least there has to be divine willing, and also divine power. But what would make it the case that these, different from all other divine properties, precede the divine choice, instead of following it? And what should be said about their nature, if these are not, like all other divine properties, constituted and determined by Jesus Christ? This leads to the third problem: not only what properties, but also, what subject precedes the divine choice?
- Top 20 Most Damning Bible Contradictions.
- Crib Notes?
- A Sheesha in Radcliffe;
- Lippincotts Illustrated Q&A Review of Microbiology and Immunology.
- Top 20 Most Damning Bible Contradictions;
- Witch Wars (Anti-Heroes Book VI).
We can use necessarily, like Barth does. If McCormack takes God to enjoy necessary being, the essential act of the election of Jesus Christ would also be a necessary act. There is no absolute or objective morality. If there was an objective morality, you could just show how you got the knowledge.
The Shortcomings of Sci-Fi Visionaries
If you say you got it by pretending you know what an imaginary thingy says is objective morality, you will be laughed at. Picking things out of your imagination about things you cannot perceive by your senses is far less reliable than understanding things through your senses. If our senses are such a poor predictor of reality I propose a test. We stand at the edge of a busy highway and on the count of three we each do our best to cross the road. I can use my powers of observation and can walk down to the corner and hit crosswalk button which may or may not be imaginary and wait for the possibly imaginary lights to change and stop the potentially imaginary cars before I head across.
And you can use your prayers and trust in a potentially real God to guide you safely to the other side. We carefully craft an illusion of God the surrounds us and comforts us, but when it comes right down to it, we know. People often disagree on what is right or wrong. Even self-proclaimed Christians all claiming the same source have differing opinions on right and wrong.
We decide who is wrong or right through things like social influence, debate, rules and laws. Not everyone always agrees. Asking questions so no one sees that the glaring question remains yours to answer? Yeah, you totally pulled off that rhetorical trick. Your undefended claim of objective morality is sitting there like a stinky turd. You going to take care of it? Upon what do you base this statement? Man stealing was punishable by death. The Bible makes a clear distinction between slave bought with money, indentured servants, and hired hands.
Genesis NRSV 12 Throughout your generations every male among you shall be circumcised when he is eight days old, including the slave born in your house and the one bought with your money from any foreigner who is not of your offspring. So shall my covenant be in your flesh an everlasting covenant. Exodus NRSV 44 but any slave who has been purchased may eat of it after he has been circumcised; 45 no bound or hired servant may eat of it. Israelite indentured servants were not to be treated harshly but those bought with money could be.
- HISTORICAL FOUNDATIONS OF CHRISTIANITY.
- A Childs Garden of Verses (Illustrated and Annotated Edition).
- The Well-tempered Clavier (Book II): Prelude and Fugue No. 11;
Leviticus 44 As for the male and female slaves whom you may have, it is from the nations around you that you may acquire male and female slaves. These you may treat as slaves, but as for your fellow Israelites, no one shall rule over the other with harshness. Exodus 2 When you buy a male Hebrew slave, he shall serve six years, but in the seventh he shall go out a free person, without debt. He shall be brought to the door or the doorpost; and his master shall pierce his ear with an awl; and he shall serve him for life.
Slaves could be beaten.
The Mystery of the Eternal Life—How Can Christians Gain Eternal Life?
Exodus 20 When a slaveowner strikes a male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies immediately, the owner shall be punished. NO, rather they are men. NO, comrades. NO, they are unpretentious friends. NO, they are our fellow-slaves, if one reflects that Fortune has equal rights over slaves and free men alike. That is why I smile at those who think it degrading for a man to dine with his slave. But why should they think it degrading? It is only purse-proud etiquette… All night long they must stand about hungry and dumb… They are not enemies when we acquire them; we make them enemies… This is the kernel of my advice: Treat your inferiors as you would be treated by your betters.
The bible has YawehJesus ordering the enslavement of people…including virgins as sex slaves, raped. No, American slavery and biblical slavery were pretty much identical. Exodus NASB : 16He who kidnaps a man, whether he sells him or he is found in his possession, shall surely be put to death. Given that the Hebrews were instructed in Leviticus to obtain their slaves from the people around them, it is evident that this injunction to not abduct people referred to Hebrews and not non-Hebrews. Obtaining and selling non-Hebrews was evidently not a problem.
Deuteronomy specifies that only the abduction of Hebrews to enslave them is a crime. And with that revelation, became stories and writings, ultimately culminating into a flawed contradictory-filled book, claiming authority over the masses and promising the defectors an eternity of flame-filled existence?
Sorry, but some of us completed 2nd grade and on the way learned that the fraudulent, gift-giving St. Nicholas was really just Mom and Dad. If something is eternal and almighty, it could create whatever it wanted. The whole thing is stupid. Man is fallen and sinful.